Both types of approaches give us a valuable understanding of robbery, but together they offer an even richer understanding. Microsociologists would instead focus on such things as why individual robbers decide to commit a robbery and how they select their targets. Macrosociologists would discuss such things as why robbery rates are higher in poorer communities and whether these rates change with changes in the national economy. The different but complementary nature of these two approaches can be seen in the case of armed robbery. These sociologists examine how and why individuals interact and interpret the meanings of their interaction. Figure 1.9: Microsociologists examine the interaction of small groups of people, such as the two women conversing here. Their views taken together offer a fuller understanding of the phenomena than either approach can offer alone. Often macro- and microsociologists look at the same phenomena but do so in different ways. They look at how families, coworkers, and other small groups of people interact why they interact the way they do and how they interpret the meanings of their own interactions and of the social settings in which they find themselves. Microsociologists, on the other hand, study social interaction. They look at the large-scale social forces that change the course of human society and the lives of individuals. Macrosociologists focus on the big picture, which usually means such things as social structure, social institutions, and social, political, and economic change. \)Īlthough this may be overly simplistic, sociologists’ views basically fall into two camps: macrosociology and microsociology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |